Bikes Overview
In the realm of adventure touring, two contenders stand out: the BMW G 310 GS and the Suzuki V-Strom SX. Both bikes embody the spirit of exploration, promising to take riders on thrilling journeys across diverse terrains.
The BMW G 310 GS, a member of BMW’s acclaimed GS series, brings the brand’s expertise in crafting capable adventure machines to the entry-level segment. With its distinctive design and BMW’s reputation for quality, the G 310 GS aims to attract riders seeking a balance of on-road refinement and off-road prowess.

On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom SX represents Suzuki’s foray into the adventure touring category. Drawing from the success of its larger V-Strom siblings, the SX promises to deliver a compelling package that combines versatility, affordability, and the renowned reliability of Suzuki motorcycles.

Engine and Performance Comparison
At the heart of these adventure tourers lie their engines, which play a crucial role in defining their character and capabilities. Let’s dive into the specifics:
Attribute | BMW G 310 GS | Suzuki V-Strom SX |
Engine Type | Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and finger followers, wet sump lubrication | 4-stroke, Single-cylinder, oil-cooled, SOHC |
Displacement | 313 cc | 249 cc |
Peak Power | 34 PS @ 9500 rpm | 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm |
Max Torque | 28 Nm @ 7500 rpm | 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm |
Fuel Supply | Fuel Injection | Fuel Injection |
Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Oil Cooled |
The BMW G 310 GS boasts a more advanced engine configuration, with a water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine featuring four valves and two overhead camshafts. This translates to higher power and torque figures compared to the Suzuki V-Strom SX’s oil-cooled, SOHC engine.
In terms of performance, the BMW G 310 GS has a clear edge, delivering 34 PS of peak power and 28 Nm of torque. The Suzuki V-Strom SX, while still capable, produces a more modest 26.5 PS and 22.2 Nm.
Both bikes employ fuel injection systems for precise throttle response and efficient fuel delivery. However, the BMW’s liquid cooling system provides better heat management, especially during extended rides in challenging conditions.
Suspension and Handling Comparison
Adventure touring demands a suspension setup that can handle a wide range of terrains while providing comfort and control. Let’s compare how these bikes fare:
Attribute | BMW G 310 GS | Suzuki V-Strom SX |
Suspension Front | Upside Down Fork, Ø 41 mm | Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped |
Suspension Rear | Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut, spring pre-load adjustable | Swing arm type, coil spring, oil damped |
Wheelbase | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Ground Clearance | N/A | 205 mm |
The BMW G 310 GS features a premium upside-down fork at the front, offering superior stiffness and improved handling precision. The rear suspension consists of a cast aluminum dual swingarm with a central spring strut and adjustable preload, allowing riders to fine-tune the setup according to their preferences and load.
In contrast, the Suzuki V-Strom SX employs a more traditional telescopic front fork and a swingarm-type rear suspension. While this setup may not provide the same level of adjustability as the BMW, it still delivers a comfortable and stable ride.

The V-Strom SX has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the G 310 GS’s 1420 mm, which contributes to its stability at higher speeds. However, the BMW’s shorter wheelbase and upside-down fork give it an edge in terms of agility and maneuverability, especially in tight off-road sections.
Advanced Electronics and Rider Aids Comparison
Modern adventure tourers often come equipped with advanced electronics and rider aids to enhance safety, control, and convenience. Let’s see how the BMW G 310 GS and Suzuki V-Strom SX stack up:
Attribute | BMW G 310 GS | Suzuki V-Strom SX |
ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
Traction Control | N/A | N/A |
Display | Yes | N/A |
Both the BMW G 310 GS and Suzuki V-Strom SX come standard with dual-channel ABS, providing enhanced braking safety in various conditions. However, neither bike offers traction control, which could be a drawback for riders seeking additional assistance in low-traction situations.
The BMW G 310 GS has an advantage in terms of instrumentation, featuring a digital display that provides essential ride information. The Suzuki V-Strom SX, on the other hand, lacks a digital display, relying on more traditional instrumentation.
While both bikes offer basic electronic aids, they miss out on advanced features like ride modes, customizable ABS, or smartphone connectivity, which are increasingly common in the adventure touring segment.
Ergonomics and Comfort Comparison
Adventure touring often involves long hours in the saddle, traversing varied terrains. Ergonomics and comfort play a vital role in ensuring a pleasant and fatigue-free riding experience. Let’s compare the BMW G 310 GS and Suzuki V-Strom SX in this regard:
Attribute | BMW G 310 GS | Suzuki V-Strom SX |
Seat Type | Split | Split |
Saddle Height | 835 mm | 835 mm |
Kerb Weight | 169.5 kg | 167 kg |
Both the BMW G 310 GS and Suzuki V-Strom SX feature split seats, which allow riders to move around and find a comfortable position during long rides. The saddle height for both bikes is identical at 835 mm, making them accessible to a wide range of riders.

In terms of weight, the Suzuki V-Strom SX has a slight advantage, tipping the scales at 167 kg compared to the BMW G 310 GS’s 169.5 kg. This marginal difference in weight is unlikely to have a significant impact on comfort or maneuverability.
Both bikes offer an upright riding position, with a comfortable reach to the handlebars and foot pegs. The windscreens provide decent wind protection, although taller riders may prefer an aftermarket option for improved coverage.
Adventure Readiness and Gear Compatibility
Adventure tourers are designed to tackle a variety of terrains and weather conditions. Let’s assess how well-equipped the BMW G 310 GS and Suzuki V-Strom SX are for adventure riding straight from the factory:
Attribute | BMW G 310 GS | Suzuki V-Strom SX |
Wheels Type | Cast Aluminium | Alloy |
Tyre Size – Front | 110/80-R19 | N/A |
Tyre Size – Rear | 150/70-R17 | N/A |
Fuel Capacity | 11 L | 12 L |
The BMW G 310 GS comes equipped with cast aluminum wheels, while the Suzuki V-Strom SX features alloy wheels. Both types of wheels offer durability and resistance to impacts, making them suitable for adventure riding.
In terms of tire sizes, the BMW G 310 GS is fitted with a 110/80-R19 front tire and a 150/70-R17 rear tire. These dimensions are well-suited for a mix of on-road and off-road riding. The Suzuki V-Strom SX’s tire sizes are not specified in the provided data.
Fuel capacity is an essential consideration for adventure tourers, as it determines the bike’s range between fill-ups. The Suzuki V-Strom SX has a slight advantage here, with a 12-liter fuel tank compared to the BMW G 310 GS’s 11-liter capacity.

Both bikes come with basic protection features like engine guards and hand guards. However, serious adventurers may want to invest in additional accessories like crash bars, skid plates, and luggage systems to enhance their bike’s adventure readiness.
Value and Ownership Comparison
When considering an adventure tourer, it’s essential to evaluate the overall value proposition and ownership experience. Let’s compare the BMW G 310 GS and Suzuki V-Strom SX in this context:
Attribute | BMW G 310 GS | Suzuki V-Strom SX |
Price | Rs. 3,30,000 | Rs. 2,11,600 |
Number of Variants | 1 | 1 |
Variant Names and Prices | BMW G 310 GS ABS BS6 – Rs. 3,30,000 | Suzuki V Strom SX STD – Rs. 2,11,600 |
The BMW G 310 GS carries a premium price tag of Rs. 3,30,000, while the Suzuki V-Strom SX is more affordable at Rs. 2,11,600. This significant price difference can be attributed to factors like brand reputation, build quality, and features offered.

Both bikes are available in a single variant, simplifying the decision-making process for potential buyers. The BMW G 310 GS ABS BS6 and Suzuki V Strom SX STD come equipped with standard features at their respective price points.
In terms of build quality and reliability, both BMW and Suzuki have a strong reputation in the motorcycle industry. However, BMW’s expertise in the adventure touring segment and its extensive dealership network may provide a more premium ownership experience.
Aftermarket support and accessories are crucial for adventure tourers, as riders often customize their bikes to suit their specific needs. The BMW G 310 GS benefits from a wider range of aftermarket options, giveOn the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom SX presents a more affordable option, making it an attractive choice for riders on a budget. While it may not match the BMW in terms of outright performance or features, it still delivers a capable and reliable adventure touring package.n its popularity and the brand’s global presence.
Conclusion
After a thorough comparison of the BMW G 310 GS and Suzuki V-Strom SX, it’s evident that both bikes have their strengths and weaknesses. The BMW G 310 GS offers superior performance, premium features, and the backing of a renowned brand in the adventure touring segment. However, this comes at a significantly higher price point.
Ultimately, the choice between the BMW G 310 GS and Suzuki V-Strom SX depends on the rider’s priorities, budget, and specific requirements. Those willing to invest in a premium, feature-rich adventure tourer will find the BMW G 310 GS a compelling option. Meanwhile, riders seeking a more affordable entry point into the world of adventure touring may find the Suzuki V-Strom SX a suitable choice.
Regardless of the bike chosen, both the BMW G 310 GS and Suzuki V-Strom SX offer the opportunity to explore new horizons, conquer challenging terrains, and experience the thrill of adventure touring. It’s essential for riders to evaluate their needs, test-ride both bikes, and make an informed decision based on their personal preferences and riding style.
The post BMW G 310 GS vs. Suzuki V-Strom SX: Clash of the Adventure Tourers first appeared on Cartoq.